Will Stone summarizes the CDC advisory committee’s rollback of two vaccines for youths and the restrictions on the COVID-19 vaccine.
SCOTT SIMON, HOST:
It was chaotic and at occasions tense as a vaccine panel that advises the federal authorities and met in Atlanta this week. The committee guides the Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention on who ought to get vaccines and when, and so they’ve been embroiled in controversy beneath the management of Well being Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. NPR’s Will Stone spent the final two days watching the assembly and joins us now. Will, thanks for being with us.
WILL STONE, BYLINE: Thanks for having me.
SIMON: Did the committee make any adjustments to the vaccine schedule?
STONE: They did. The largest concrete change was a call to cease youngsters beneath 4 from getting a mix shot for measles, mumps, rubella and chickenpox. That is the MMRV vaccine, Scott. And at difficulty is a few information from the CDC exhibiting a barely elevated danger of fever-related seizures in some infants after getting that shot. Now, the overwhelming majority of kids don’t get this single shot. As a substitute, they get the MMR vaccine and a separate one to cowl chickenpox. And representatives from medical teams who have been on the assembly stated the adjustments have been pointless, might restrict entry. However finally, the committee went forward and determined to restrict the pictures anyhow.
SIMON: Was this a shock, Will? ‘Trigger there’s been hypothesis we might see a lot greater adjustments in that coverage.
STONE: Yeah, that is proper. Bear in mind, Kennedy fired all the present members of this influential vaccine committee and handpicked the replacements, as a few of them have a historical past of being important of vaccines. And there was a push to take away the advice that youngsters get the hepatitis B vaccine proper after they’re born. This has been in place for a very long time, and CDC scientists on the assembly emphasize it is helped minimize charges of this illness dramatically. The controversy, I might say, was only one instance of the broader tensions right here between the medical institution and these new committee members. Take a take heed to Dr. Flor Munoz, who isn’t on the committee however spoke through the assembly. She’s with the Infectious Illnesses Society of America.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
FLOR MUNOZ: Why? Why are we addressing this hepatitis B vaccine advice? Is there actually a cause that the committee can present for making a change?
STONE: You heard some variation of this query all through the two-day assembly from many specialists who have been there. Now, within the case of the hepatitis B vaccine, that proposal did find yourself failing after the committee voted to desk it to get extra info.
SIMON: Any adjustments made to the COVID-19 vaccine?
STONE: There have been some adjustments, although, the committee finally backed away from its most controversial proposal that referred to as for states to require a prescription for the COVID-19 vaccine. There have been a collection of votes, and I will must say, Scott, the entire course of was fairly convoluted. For a lot of the day, it wasn’t clear what the committee would even be voting on. In the long run, they determined that anybody over six months outdated can get the shot, however they did name for sufferers to talk with a clinician in regards to the dangers and advantages.
Additionally they referred to as on the data sheets in regards to the vaccines to incorporate extra details about doable dangers and uncertainty in regards to the effectiveness of the vaccines. Despite the fact that CDC scientists share information exhibiting the vaccines nonetheless supply safety towards extreme illness, there was appreciable time dedicated to shows about security issues, together with some unproven theories about hyperlinks to most cancers. All of this was actually troubling to the medical specialists there, who fear it would gas extra doubts and confusion across the vaccines.
SIMON: Properly, you’ve got monitored a variety of these conferences over time. How was this one totally different?
STONE: Properly, it was placing to see what number of specialists representing main medical organizations have actually been sidelined from the method in ways in which you didn’t see beneath earlier administrations. This is Dr. Sandra Fryhofer. She spoke on behalf of the American Medical Affiliation on Friday forward of the COVID-19 votes.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
SANDRA FRYHOFER: And it is troubling to see the erosion of the committee’s integrity. We’re involved about how vaccine suggestions are being developed by this new panel. Knowledge’s being selectively used to justify particular conclusions, slightly than contemplating the entire accessible proof.
STONE: So this gathering underscored the turbulent, extremely politicized nature of vaccine coverage beneath the management of Well being Secretary Kennedy, which is now at odds with the medical institution.
SIMON: NPR’s Will Stone. Thanks a lot.
STONE: Thanks.
Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights reserved. Go to our web site phrases of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for additional info.
Accuracy and availability of NPR transcripts might range. Transcript textual content could also be revised to appropriate errors or match updates to audio. Audio on npr.org could also be edited after its unique broadcast or publication. The authoritative report of NPR’s programming is the audio report.
