Automated browser testing has turn into an indispensable a part of fashionable net improvement. With groups pushing complicated purposes and frequent updates to them, robust check automation software program is required to ensure high quality and pace.
For a few years, Selenium has been the gold normal on this discipline, powering numerous check suites in corporations around the globe.
Extra just lately, nonetheless, Selenium has begun to lose floor to a more moderen automation instrument, Playwright, a Microsoft framework common owing to its fashionable design and developer-friendly API.
What Is Selenium?
Selenium is probably going essentially the most well-established instrument within the discipline of automated browser testing (over 35,000 corporations reported utilizing Selenium in 2025).
Initially launched in 2004, it has grown to turn into the de facto trade normal for practical testing of net purposes. Whereas a lot of the present instruments for automated testing characterize one product, Selenium represents a set of instruments:
- Selenium WebDriver: The underlying API upon which builders write check scripts and speak to browsers.
- Selenium IDE: A record-and-playback instrument which may be utilized even by non-tech customers to construct easy check circumstances.
- Selenium Grid: A system for operating assessments in parallel on quite a few machines, which is critical for in depth software program testing.
Within the background, Selenium is definitely applied on high of the WebDriver protocol. It interprets check instructions into JSON, sends them over HTTP to browser drivers, after which makes them execute throughout the browser. This structure has labored nicely for generations, although it does come at some efficiency expense.
What distinguishes Selenium is its protection. Selenium gives assist for almost all of the outstanding programming languages (Java, Python, C#, PHP, and JavaScript) and all the highest browsers (Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, and even Web Explorer).
With twenty years of utilization, it additionally has an enormous neighborhood, in depth CI/CD pipeline integration, and an abundance of documentation and tutorials.
What Is Playwright?
Constructed by Microsoft and made obtainable in 2020, Playwright was created with fashionable net improvement in thoughts to resolve quite a lot of the problems testers have been going through when making use of Selenium for browser automation.

Architecturally, Playwright takes a distinct method. As a substitute of utilizing the WebDriver protocol and HTTP requests, it communicates with browsers via a long-lived WebSocket connection.
Playwright runs on the three most used browser engines — Chromium, Firefox, and WebKit — so it targets Chrome, Edge, and Safari. Playwright additionally boasts stable cell emulation and experimental assist for testing precise Android units.
By way of programming languages, Playwright runs on JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, Java, and .NET, that are essentially the most used improvement stacks at the moment.
Playwright vs. Selenium: Key Function Comparability
Playwright and Selenium each try to resolve the identical drawback — enabling automated browser testing — however in pretty other ways. Allow us to look at their variations via the options most important to improvement groups all through the software program improvement life cycle.
Ease of Setup and Use
Getting Selenium up and operating typically entails a number of steps. You’ll want to put in the right browser drivers, typically a standalone server, and configure all the pieces so the check scripts can speak to the browser.
This flexibility is certainly highly effective, but it surely comes at the price of added complexity, particularly for newcomers.
Playwright is less complicated in its nature. As soon as put in, it robotically downloads the browsers it wants. No further server setup or driver setup is required, so you may write and execute assessments instantly.
For groups that choose quick onboarding and minimal configuration, Playwright is the clear winner right here.
Language Help
Selenium helps virtually the entire high programming languages, together with Java, Python, C#, Ruby, PHP, Perl, and JavaScript. That makes it an ideal slot in organizations the place improvement groups use various stacks.
Playwright has fewer languages supported, but it surely selects essentially the most broadly used ones: JavaScript/TypeScript, Python, Java, and .NET. For many fashionable net purposes, this listing is greater than acceptable.
Browser and Platform Help
Selenium’s assist for browsers is unmatched. It might probably work with Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, and even Web Explorer — making it important for tasks which might be nonetheless required to be appropriate with older environments. It additionally features on Home windows, macOS, Linux, and Solaris.

Playwright helps the three main browser engines — WebKit, Firefox, and Chromium — which interprets to robust protection of Safari, Edge, and Chrome.
IE assist is lacking, but it surely compensates via robust cell emulation assist and experimental Android real-device assessments. For contemporary net improvement, this normally covers all the pieces wanted.
Pace and Efficiency
Considered one of Playwright’s most vital promoting factors is pace. As a result of it makes use of a persistent WebSocket connection to speak with browsers, there’s much less back-and-forth in comparison with Selenium’s WebDriver protocol, which sends instructions as JSON over HTTP.
This design distinction results in Playwright not solely being quicker but in addition extra environment friendly beneath real-world hundreds.
Selenium’s method has been a reliable possibility for years, however further communication overhead bogs down assessments, particularly when scaled up.
Take a look at Reliability (Flakiness)
Flaky assessments are a nightmare for each QA staff. With Selenium, builders manually deal with synchronization utilizing specific waits or third-party libraries. If not correctly managed, assessments will fail intermittently.
Playwright reduces the problem with auto-waiting inbuilt. The check framework robotically waits for parts to turn into obtainable earlier than dealing with them, which ends up in fewer false failures and extra secure check runs.
API Design and Developer Expertise
Selenium’s API is highly effective however can really feel verbose. Writing assessments normally requires extra strains of code to deal with waits and synchronizations.

Playwright boasts a cleaner, fashionable API. Clicking, hovering, or filling out kinds wants fewer strains of code. For builders who like to write down brief and expressive code, Playwright is a greater different.
Group and Ecosystem
Being in the marketplace for almost twenty years, Selenium has one of many greatest check automation communities.
There is a gigantic library of tutorials, libraries, and integrations with CI/CD instruments. If you’re caught someplace, it’s possible that somebody has already found out how one can resolve it.
The Playwright neighborhood is smaller however rising very quick. Backed by Microsoft, it’s being actively contributed to, and fashionable frameworks are more and more integrating with it.
Superior Options
Essentially the most spectacular a part of Selenium is Selenium Grid, which permits distributed and parallel check execution on a number of machines. It’s extremely useful for big groups and enterprise testing.
Playwright comes with a collection of superior capabilities out of the field: screenshots, video seize, community interception, machine and geolocation simulation, and even timezone manipulation.
They arrive with no further plugins, which is why Playwright is very well-suited for modern, feature-rich net purposes.
Take a look at Runner & Framework Integration
Selenium doesn’t have a check runner inbuilt, however is appropriate with JUnit, TestNG, NUnit, and Pytest frameworks. That flexibility permits groups to pair it with no matter runner most closely fits their workflow.
Playwright has a built-in check runner, which gives an built-in method for many who like having all the pieces bundled collectively. It’s nonetheless appropriate with Jest, Mocha, Jasmine, and Pytest, nonetheless.
| Function | Selenium | Playwright |
| Setup | Requires browser drivers and typically a server; extra complicated for newcomers. | Auto-downloads browsers; minimal setup, able to run assessments shortly. |
| Languages | Helps Java, Python, C#, Ruby, PHP, Perl, JavaScript — very versatile. | Helps JS/TS, Python, Java, .NET — covers most fashionable net tasks. |
| Browser Help | Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, IE; works on Home windows, macOS, Linux, Solaris. | Chromium, Firefox, WebKit; robust cell emulation, no IE. |
| Pace | Slower as a consequence of WebDriver over HTTP. | Quicker with WebSocket-based communication. |
| Take a look at Reliability | Handbook waits wanted; flaky assessments doable. | Constructed-in auto-wait reduces flakiness. |
| API & Dev Expertise | Verbose, requires extra code. | Fashionable, concise, simpler to keep up. |
| Group | Giant, mature ecosystem. | Smaller however rising quick. |
| Superior Options | Selenium Grid permits distributed testing. | Screenshots, video, community interception, machine & geolocation simulation built-in. |
| Take a look at Runner | No built-in runner; integrates with JUnit, TestNG, Pytest, and many others. | Constructed-in runner; additionally appropriate with Jest, Mocha, Jasmine, Pytest. |
Evaluating Playwright and Selenium: At a Look
Execs and Cons of Selenium
Selenium has been round for a very long time, and that maturity is one in every of its greatest benefits. Its software program has been utilized by 1000’s of corporations for a few years, so workers know they’re working with a confirmed product.
The downsides principally come from its age and structure. As a result of Selenium communicates with browsers over HTTP, assessments typically run slower than with newer alternate options, corresponding to Playwright, which use faster connections.
Assessments will also be much less dependable — they’re recognized to randomly fail if synchronization isn’t addressed fastidiously, which implies builders typically have so as to add further waits and timeouts.
Setting Selenium up takes extra effort too, since that you must set up browser drivers and typically configure Selenium Grid, which may be tough for newcomers.
Lastly, the code itself tends to be extra wordy than in fashionable frameworks. Writing and sustaining assessments can take extra strains and energy, making scripts more durable to maintain clear over time.
Execs and Cons of Playwright
Playwright is far newer than Selenium, but it surely shortly made a reputation for itself because of its pace and fashionable design. As we said earlier, its structure makes use of a WebSocket connection as a substitute of HTTP, which makes assessments run noticeably quicker.

Nevertheless, being newer has its trade-offs. Playwright’s neighborhood is smaller in comparison with Selenium’s, so there could also be fewer tutorials and third-party integrations obtainable.
It additionally helps fewer programming languages, which might not be sufficient for groups working in much less frequent stacks.
Lastly, Playwright doesn’t assist legacy browsers like Web Explorer, which makes it much less appropriate for tasks that also want to check older environments.
When to Select Every Take a look at Automation Software: Use Circumstances
So, which automation framework do you have to go together with — Selenium or Playwright? As all the time, the reply depends upon your staff’s priorities and the sort of purposes you’re testing.
Selenium is more likely to be a better option for organizations with well-established infrastructures and complicated expertise stacks. In case your staff works throughout a number of programming languages, or it’s important to assist older browsers corresponding to Web Explorer, Selenium remains to be one of the best wager.
Its lengthy historical past and big neighborhood additionally make it simpler to search out assets, troubleshoot points, and combine with present CI/CD pipelines. For groups that worth stability and a confirmed monitor report, Selenium stays the secure wager.
In comparison with Selenium, Playwright is right in case you’re beginning contemporary with check automation or specializing in fashionable net purposes. It has fast set up, runs quicker, and produces extra dependable outcomes.
Builders preferring concise, clear code will respect its fashionable API, whereas groups engaged on complicated purposes can make the most of superior options, corresponding to video recording, screenshots, and machine emulation with out further plugins.
Â
Often Requested Questions (FAQs)
Is Playwright higher than Selenium for end-to-end testing?
Not all the time. Playwright is quicker and simpler to arrange, whereas Selenium helps extra languages and older net browsers. The only option depends upon your challenge.
Can Playwright absolutely exchange Selenium?
For contemporary net apps, it may. But when that you must check Web Explorer or much less frequent languages, Selenium remains to be the safer possibility.
Which one runs quicker?
Playwright gives good execution pace. Its WebSocket connection makes assessments faster in comparison with Selenium’s older WebDriver method.
Does Playwright work for cell automation testing wants?
It doesn’t check native cell apps, however it may emulate cell browsers and even run assessments on Android units in some circumstances.
Can I take advantage of Selenium and Playwright collectively?
Sure. Some groups preserve Selenium for legacy protection and use Playwright for quicker, fashionable net testing.
Which net automation testing instrument has a stronger neighborhood?
Selenium has been round longer, so its neighborhood is larger with plenty of tutorials and instruments. Playwright’s neighborhood is smaller however rising shortly, with robust assist from Microsoft.
Do each work with CI/CD pipelines?
Sure. Each Selenium and Playwright can plug into programs like Jenkins, GitHub Actions, or GitLab CI with out a lot hassle.
