When the Fed Cuts: Classes from Previous Cycles for Traders

The Federal Reserve’s fee cuts in 2024 reignited a debate acquainted to buyers: do easing cycles lengthen expansions or sign looming recession? With inflation nonetheless a menace, the Fed’s subsequent transfer carries actual penalties for portfolios. Historical past presents a information. Previous cycles reveal how financial shifts have influenced recessions, bear markets, and funding kinds management, classes buyers can use as they navigate right now’s late-cycle surroundings.

Echoing Milton Friedman’s commentary concerning the “lengthy and variable lags” of financial coverage, this publish examines historic Fed fee cycles to evaluate their relationship throughout quite a lot of market dynamics.

By analyzing previous information, we intention to supply insights into how financial coverage actions have traditionally influenced yield curves, type management, and financial outcomes — insights that may assist buyers interpret right now’s cycle.

KEY OBSERVATIONS

Price Reduce Cycles

• Two out of 10 earlier fee reduce cycles averted a recession, with the 2024 reduce cycle marking the three^rd out of 11, if the recession is averted within the present cycle.
• Fairness type efficiency has been extraordinarily blended after cuts throughout each recessionary and non-recessionary intervals.

Price Hike Cycles

• Throughout 12 fee hike cycles since 1965, we have now skilled 10 yield curve inversions and eight recessions, if the present inversion continues to keep away from a recession.
• The one hike cycle that included an inversion however averted a recession was 1966, (much like present interval) coincided with a ~3% deficit/GDP fiscal growth, just like the ~3% fiscal growth over the previous 4 years.

Yield Curve Inversions

• The vary of time of a yield curve inversion to market peak was two to fifteen months for the eight out of 9 yield curve inversions that preceded a recession. At present, we sit at 35 months.
• One earlier yield curve inversion (1966) averted a recession, and we noticed progress, excessive beta, and high quality kinds main efficiency because the curve normalized, like right now.

Determine 1 presents fairness market efficiency throughout three distinct intervals following the Fed’s preliminary fee reduce: months one to12, 13 to 24, and 25 to 36. Whereas returns are typically broadly constructive, the dearth of a constant sample throughout cycles signifies that outcomes are largely influenced by the precise macroeconomic surroundings through which every easing cycle happens.

Determine 1: High 1000 Returns After Price Cuts.

Disclosures: Previous efficiency is not any assure of future outcomes. All of the returns within the chart above are in reference to unmanaged, hypothetical safety groupings created completely for analytical functions. Please see appendix for definitions and citations.

Determine 2 illustrates the historic relationship between Fed rate-cutting cycles, recessions, and bear markets. Evaluation of 12 distinct cycles reveals that in 10 situations, the Fed initiated fee cuts solely after fairness markets had already peaked, suggesting a lag in coverage responsiveness. Moreover, recessions have sometimes been recognized by the Nationwide Bureau of Financial Analysis (NBER) with a delay of 4 to 21 months following their precise onset. Notably, because the extremely unstable financial surroundings of the Seventies, the Fed has extra steadily begun fee cuts previous to the formal recognition of a recession.

Determine 2: Federal Reserve Price Reduce Cycles.

Disclosures: Please see appendix for definitions and citations. 

Determine 3 exhibits the efficiency of assorted funding kinds following the initiation of Fed rate-cutting cycles. The info revealed a blended sample of returns, underscoring the idiosyncratic nature of every cycle. One believable clarification for this variability is that financial easing doesn’t constantly align with fairness market cycles, generally leading to divergent funding type conduct. There simply doesn’t appear to be a connection between rate-cut cycles, recessions, and market danger conduct, making type persistence unimaginable to anticipate.

Determine 3: Type Extra Returns 1-Yr After First Price Reduce.

Disclosures: Previous efficiency is not any assure of future outcomes. All of the returns within the chart above are in reference to unmanaged, hypothetical safety groupings created completely for analytical functions. These are hypothetical kinds primarily based on describing traits. Please see appendix for definitions and citations. Extra Return is Annualized Return over the High 1000 Portfolio.

Since 1965, there have been 12 distinct rate-hiking cycles, of which eight culminated in recessions, 10 had been preceded by yield-curve inversions, and 9 coincided with bear markets (Determine 4). The median length of those cycles is 18 months, starting from 12 to 39 months, whereas the median enhance within the federal funds fee was 3.75%, with a variety between 1.75% and 13%. The median time from the beginning of a mountaineering cycle to the market peak previous a recession was 22 months, with a variety of 4 to 51 months.

Determine 4: Federal Reserve Price Hike Cycles.

Disclosures: Please see appendix for definitions and citations. 

Within the majority of rate-hiking cycles, the Fed continued to tighten financial coverage even after fairness markets had reached their peak. This sample reinforces the long-held adage that bull markets aren’t ended by outdated age, however by the actions of the Fed. Whereas this aggressive stance usually contributes to financial contraction, there are situations the place the Fed has tried to preemptively mitigate recessionary pressures.

In 5 of the eight recessions noticed since 1965, the Fed started slicing rates of interest previous to the official onset of financial contraction, indicating a proactive coverage shift geared toward cushioning the financial system. Nonetheless, as these 5 episodes illustrate, preemptive fee cuts don’t all the time reach averting recessions, underscoring the constraints of financial coverage as soon as broader financial momentum begins to deteriorate.

The efficiency of funding kinds within the 12 months following the top of rate-hiking cycles has been blended, reflecting the cycle-specific nature of financial coverage and market dynamics. This variability doubtless stems from financial cycles not constantly aligning with fairness market cycles. Within the Seventies, for instance, the Fed usually transitioned instantly from mountaineering to slicing charges, making post-hike and post-cut return profiles successfully indistinguishable.

One historic sample that continues is that top beta shares are sometimes among the many finest or worst performers and worth and high quality shares are sometimes higher than common and barely amongst the worst. This commentary can be persistent following the top of mountaineering cycles.

Determine 5: Type Extra Returns 1 Yr After Final Price Hike.

Disclosures: Previous efficiency is not any assure of future outcomes. All of the returns within the chart above are in reference to unmanaged, hypothetical safety groupings created completely for analytical functions. These are hypothetical kinds primarily based on describing traits. Please see appendix for definitions and citations. Extra Return is Annualized Return over the High 1000 Portfolio.

Determine 6: Yield Curve Inversions.

Disclosures: Please see appendix for definitions and citations. 

Throughout the 12 distinct financial tightening cycles, 10 had been accompanied by yield curve inversions. Of those 10 inversions, eight had been adopted by recessions, underscoring the predictive energy of the yield curve as a number one financial indicator (Determine 5).

Yield curve inversions have traditionally coincided with each recessions and bear markets. The connection between inversion and market peak diverse considerably, starting from 12 months previous to the inversion to fifteen months after. This variability highlights the complexity of market responses to financial coverage shifts.

Two rate-hiking cycles — 1984 and 1995 — stand out as exceptions, having achieved “gentle landings” with out both a yield curve inversion or a subsequent recession. Conversely, the 1966 and 2022 cycles skilled yield curve inversions however averted recessions.

The 1966 cycle is mentioned intimately in our publish, Bear Market Playbook: Decoding Recession Threat, Valuation Affect, and Type Management, the place we attribute the absence of recession to extremely stimulative fiscal coverage. Nonetheless, this coverage backdrop finally contributed to the eventual recession and bear market of 1968.

Parallels may be drawn between the fiscal surroundings of the mid-Nineteen Sixties and the present financial panorama. In each intervals, elevated deficit spending supported financial exercise. The inversion that started in 2022 ranks because the longest and third most extreme when it comes to length and depth. Regardless of these adversarial alerts, the US financial system and labor market have demonstrated outstanding resilience.

In line with our two prior situations, the efficiency of funding kinds within the 12 months following a yield curve inversion (Determine 7), has exhibited appreciable dispersion, underscoring the cycle-dependent nature of financial coverage and market conduct. Yield curve inversions could sign that the market is getting into the later levels of the financial cycle. In such environments, it’s not shocking to watch outperformance from high quality and progress components, which traditionally have a tendency to guide throughout late-cycle phases on account of their resilient earnings.

Determine 7: Type Extra Returns 1-Yr After Yield Curve Inversion.

Disclosures: Previous efficiency is not any assure of future outcomes. All of the returns within the chart above are in reference to unmanaged, hypothetical safety groupings created completely for analytical functions. These are hypothetical kinds primarily based on describing traits. Please see appendix for definitions and citations. Extra Return is Annualized Return over the High 1000 Portfolio.

The Fed’s historic rate of interest cycles reveal a constant sample of delayed coverage responses relative to market and financial turning factors, underscoring the “lengthy and variable lags” inherent in financial coverage. Yield curve inversions have confirmed to be a dependable recession indicator, although their timing and market impression stay variable, complicating predictive efforts.

For buyers, the document exhibits that no single coverage shift presents a transparent playbook. Price cuts have produced extremely inconsistent type outcomes, underscoring the necessity to look past coverage bulletins to the financial backdrop. Throughout mountaineering cycles, worth and high quality exposures have traditionally supplied steadier efficiency, whereas excessive beta has been a supply of each outsized positive factors and sharp losses. After inversions, progress and high quality have usually led, with excessive beta once more including upside potential however at increased danger.

The burden of historical past suggests buyers ought to view the present easing cycle via a late-cycle lens. In 1966, the financial system averted recession as fiscal growth prolonged progress, and related situations exist right now. If that parallel holds, portfolios tilted towards kinds resembling high quality and progress could proceed to their outperformance, with normal higher-beta publicity being favored throughout kinds.

On the identical time, inflation stays the swing issue: a renewed rise may drive the Fed again to tightening, traditionally creating difficult market environments. For buyers, the crucial is to place for resilience whereas staying prepared to regulate if coverage pivots once more.

Appendix & Citations

Figures 2, 4 and 6: Federal Reserve Cycles Information Tables

• S&P 500 Index Ranges. FactSet, 2025.
• Blinder, Alan. 2023. “Landings, Mushy and Laborious: The Federal Reserve, 1965-2022.” Journal of Financial Views — Quantity 37, Number one — Winter 2023 — pages 101–120
• Federal Reserve Financial institution of New York. The Yield Curve as a Main Indicator. https://www.newyorkfed.org/analysis/capital_markets/ycfaq.html.
• Federal Reserve Board. Open Market Operations. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 18 Dec. 2024. https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/openmarket.htm.
• Federal Reserve Board. Modifications within the Meant Federal Funds Price, 1971–1992. 29 Aug. 2019. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/information/20190829-changes-intended-federal-funds-rate.pdf
• Nationwide Bureau of Financial Analysis. US Enterprise Cycle Expansions and Contractions. https://www.nber.org/analysis/information/us-business-cycle-expansions-and-contractions.
• U.S. Bureau of Financial Evaluation, Actual Gross Home Product [GDPC1], retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Financial institution of St. Louis; https://fred.stlouisfed.org/sequence/GDPC1, Might 1, 2025.
• Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (US), Federal Funds Efficient Price [FEDFUNDS], retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Financial institution of St. Louis; https://fred.stlouisfed.org/sequence/FEDFUNDS, September 5, 2025.

Figures 1, 3, 5 and seven: Efficiency Charts     

• Information Supply: Compustat
• Calculation: Hartford Fairness Modeling Platform

Type and Time Interval Definitions:

• Worth: US prime 1000 shares prime 30% primarily based on composite worth as outlined by a number of equally weighted valuation metrics to reach at an aggregated valuation metric. Valuation metrics embrace: P/E, EBITDA/EV, working money circulate/EV, income/EV, and B/P Yield (used solely in financials and actual property as a substitute to EBITDA/EV), then cap weighted.
• Low Volatility: US High 1000 Shares prime 30% primarily based on a Composite Volatility rating outlined by a number of equality weighted volatility metrics to reach at an aggregated volatility metric. Volatility metrics embrace three 12 months weekly beta and six-month every day commonplace deviation, then cap weighted.
• Excessive Volatility: US prime 1000 shares backside 30% primarily based on a composite volatility rating outlined by a number of equality weighted volatility metrics to reach at an aggregated volatility metric. Volatility metrics embrace three 12 months weekly beta and six-month every day commonplace deviation, then cap weighted.
• Dividend: US prime 1000 shares prime 30% primarily based on trailing 12-month dividend per share divided by present share value, then cap weighted.
• High quality: US prime 1000 shares prime 30% primarily based on gross earnings to property, then cap weighted.
• Progress: US prime 1000 shares prime 30% primarily based on 5 years gross sales progress, then cap weighted.
• SMID: US mid-sized and small-cap shares representing the smallest 15% and 13% of shares respectively, excluding the very smallest 2% that are categorized as microcap, then cap weighted.
• Mega/Giant: US mega and enormous market cap shares with mega cap representing the most important 40% and enormous cap representing the subsequent largest 30% of the universe, then cap weighted.
• High 1000: US High 1000 shares, cap weighted.
• Yield Curve Inversions are outlined by the 10-year Treasury yield minus the three-month Treasury yield.