NPR’s Ailsa Chang speaks to Dr. Jonathan Slotkin concerning the new information launched by Waymo about accidents and their self-driving automobiles.
AILSA CHANG, HOST:
Dr. Jonathan Slotkin had witnessed this scene too many instances on the trauma middle the place he works.
JONATHAN SLOTKIN: They’re wheeling in a teen, and this one’s been ejected by means of a windshield and located 30 toes away, face down within the grime, and all of us acknowledge there’s nothing we will do. And so I am pondering to myself, how can we let the equal of 1 airplane full of individuals, greater than 100 lives, be misplaced each single day as the price of driving? If this was a illness, we’d have declared battle.
CHANG: And proper round this time, Slotkin had been taking a look at information launched by the driverless automotive firm Waymo. This was its so-called 100-million-mile information set.
SLOTKIN: And I checked out this information and mentioned, God, this virtually seems too good to be true. If we pursue this proper, in my view, we face the opportunity of really eliminating automotive accidents as a number one reason behind demise in america.
CHANG: Slotkin described this epiphany in an op-ed for The New York Instances, writing, quote, “whereas many see this as a tech story, I view it as a public well being breakthrough.” Dr. Jonathan Slotkin, welcome.
SLOTKIN: Thanks for having me, Ailsa.
CHANG: So that you wrote that this Waymo site visitors accident information led you to conclude that autonomous autos may very well be a public well being breakthrough. What did the info present precisely that convinces you of this?
SLOTKIN: What I noticed was that we had higher than a 90% discount in essentially the most critical forms of crashes that we see. So these are pedestrians struck, T-bones in intersections, that are among the worst accidents we see within the trauma bay. So it actually seems like, Ailsa, that if we pursue this proper now going ahead, we may remove automotive accidents as a number one reason behind demise in america.
CHANG: OK. But when we’re speaking about security, there have been current studies of Waymos driving fairly aggressively, like making unlawful U-turns, neglecting flip alerts, illegally passing stopped faculty buses. And simply final week, personally, a Waymo lower me off in transferring site visitors proper right here in LA. And also you even talked about in your op-ed a couple of fatalities. So should not any of that be a trigger for concern?
SLOTKIN: Properly, certain. Let me level out for those who did not learn it, these fatalities had been each not the fault of the Waymo, OK? And there was one critical damage as properly that was additionally not the fault of the Waymo driver. However actually, these are questions we’ve got to ask, and so they’re all honest questions. The college bus factor, that is critical. We won’t have these items passing faculty buses. And what I perceive is that they recognized a spot the place the automobiles had been getting confused, and so they issued a recall to replace…
CHANG: Precisely.
SLOTKIN: …The software program. However I believe let us take a look at the choice. The choice is human drivers illegally passing faculty buses a whole bunch of hundreds of instances a 12 months as a result of they’re impatient. And right here we’ve got a robotic that makes a mistake, and it may be quickly remedied with a software program replace. So I believe we settle for people being reckless as the worth of mobility, however we would like the robots to be excellent. And someplace within the center there, I believe, Ailsa, is the place we must always land.
CHANG: I believe, for me, any type of lingering discomfort I’ve with autonomous autos is simply this inherent belief I’ve in human supervision. Like, I need a human to have the ability to intervene in probably dangerous conditions. Is that illogical?
SLOTKIN: It is a pure human tendency, I believe, to be afraid of the issues we understand we will not management, and we run into that in well being care lots. This I-can-drive-after-two-drinks factor some folks have – properly, that is the notion of management, however I am afraid of the robotic that truly is statistically higher than me, however as a result of I can not management it. And I believe, for me, that is the place the info must begin to take us and say, properly, look, that is really higher.
CHANG: Properly, let me ask you this. Self-driving automobiles are nonetheless a reasonably slim minority of automobiles on the highway, even in cities like LA, the place I’m, the place these automobiles appear to be in every single place. So in need of full adoption, is there really a public well being profit to having even only a few self-driving automobiles on the highway?
SLOTKIN: Yeah, so this will get to an attention-grabbing query, and nobody really is aware of the whole reply, however there may be some revealed information that exhibits that as these scale, actually early within the adoption, chances are you’ll get disproportionate advantages even relative to how a lot has been adopted. So let’s make up a quantity and say, we may have 30% adoption however really lower fatalities by 40%. And that will get to issues like community results.
And, Ailsa, we have not even scratched the floor actually on hive habits between these autos the place they start speaking to one another in an elevated method. They relay issues about security challenges forward and so they behave higher round one another. So there may be proof that even early within the adoption curve, we are going to see security advantages.
CHANG: Dr. Jonathan Slotkin, thanks very a lot, and glad driving to you.
SLOTKIN: Thanks, Ailsa. Thanks for having me.
CHANG: And we reached out to Waymo concerning the highway security violations talked about on this story. The corporate responded in a written assertion that mentioned, partially, security is key to all the things that we do. The info exhibits we’re bettering highway security within the communities through which we function.
(SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC)
Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights reserved. Go to our web site phrases of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for additional info.
Accuracy and availability of NPR transcripts might differ. Transcript textual content could also be revised to right errors or match updates to audio. Audio on npr.org could also be edited after its authentic broadcast or publication. The authoritative report of NPR’s programming is the audio report.
